When Ruth First, anti‑apartheid activist and journalist, was killed by a letter bomb in Maputo on August 17, 1982, the world lost a scholar who blended rigorous research with frontline resistance.
Born on May 4, 1925, in Johannesburg to Eastern‑European Jewish immigrants who helped found the Communist Party of South Africa, First grew up in a household where politics was dinner‑table conversation. Her early education at the University of the Witwatersrand steered her into sociology and anthropology, but it was the campus communist cell that sparked a lifelong commitment to multiracial justice.
Early Life and Political Awakening
While still a student in 1945, First helped launch a multi‑racial student group that defied the segregationist policies of the time. Shortly after graduating, she took a job as a research assistant for Johannesburg’s Social Welfare Division before landing the editorship of The Guardian in 1946 – a newspaper brave enough to publish the voices of the oppressed. The state banned the paper within a year, marking the first of many government crackdowns that would follow her career.
In 1949 she married Joe Slovo, a fellow SACP member and chief organizer of the ANC’s armed wing, Umkhonto we Sizwe. Their partnership became the backbone of a network that linked trade‑union militants, intellectuals, and underground operatives across Southern Africa.
Journalism, the Freedom Charter, and the Treason Trial
After the 1950 ban of the original Communist Party, First helped rebuild its successor, the underground South African Communist Party (SACP). In 1953 she co‑founded the Congress of Democrats, the white wing of the broader Congress Alliance, and began editing the journal Fighting Talk, which amplified the Alliance’s call for a non‑racial future.
One of her most enduring contributions was drafting the Freedom Charter, a document that outlined a vision of equal rights, land reform, and universal suffrage. Although a banning order kept her from attending the historic Kliptown gathering on June 25‑26, 1955, her fingerprints are on every paragraph of that charter.
Later that decade, First, Slovo, Nelson Mandela, Walter Sisulu, Albert Luthuli and more than 150 other leaders were hauled into the infamous Treason Trial. The state attempted to crush the movement by dragging them through a four‑year‑and‑six‑month legal marathon. All were acquitted on March 29, 1961, but many, including First, returned to the streets under fresh banning orders.
Exile, UN Work, and Academic Leadership
Following the Sharpeville massacre in 1960, First fled to Swaziland with her three daughters, only to return briefly when the emergency was lifted. In 1963 she was arrested and endured 117 days of solitary confinement under the General Laws Amendment Act’s 90‑day detention clause – a period she later chronicled in the searing memoir 117 Days. Shortly after her release, she left South Africa for London, where she consulted for the United Nations on human‑rights violations in Southern Africa from 1964 to 1977.
During those years she also edited the successor newspaper New Age and helped shape the first broadcasts of Radio Freedom, the ANC’s clandestine voice that reached listeners across the continent. In 1977, the Mozambican government appointed her professor and research director at Eduardo Mondlane University in Maputo, where she authored dozens of scholarly works, including the groundbreaking study The South African Connection: Western Investment in Apartheid. Her research made clear how foreign capital bolstered the regime’s brutal apparatus.
Assassination and Legacy
On August 17, 1982, a letter bomb—engineered by South Africa’s security police—detonated in her Maputo office, killing First at age 57. The murder shocked the international community and underscored the lengths the apartheid state would go to silence dissent.
Ronnie Kasrils, former ANC minister and author of *The Unlikely Secret Agent*, later described First as "an outstanding revolutionary, a dangerous thorn in apartheid’s flesh." The South African Presidency has since hailed her as a model of "ultimate patriotism and love for humanity," a description that captures both her sacrifice and the intellectual rigor she brought to every campaign.
Her legacy lives on through the Ruth First Educational Trust at Durham University, where scholars continue to explore activist‑research methodologies she pioneered. The trust funds fellowships, archives her writings, and hosts public lectures that keep her ideas in circulation.
Why Ruth First Matters Today
First’s blend of investigative journalism, academic research, and street‑level organizing offers a template for modern activists confronting systemic oppression. Her work on the Freedom Charter laid the constitutional groundwork for post‑apartheid South Africa, and her UN reports still inform scholars examining how multinational corporations profit from racialized labor.
In a time when authoritarian regimes still weaponise surveillance and misinformation, First’s insistence on fact‑based, community‑driven narratives feels especially relevant. As movements for climate justice and racial equity cite her strategies, the lesson is clear: rigorous scholarship can be a weapon, and courage can turn ideas into lasting change.
Key Facts
- Born: May 4, 1925, Johannesburg.
- Assassinated: August 17, 1982, Maputo, Mozambique.
- Primary roles: anti‑apartheid activist, journalist, UN researcher, professor.
- Key affiliations: South African Communist Party, African National Congress, Eduardo Mondlane University.
- Notable works: 117 Days, The South African Connection, editor of New Age.
Frequently Asked Questions
How did Ruth First’s research influence international policy on apartheid?
First’s UN reports exposed the financial ties between Western banks and the South African regime, prompting advisory committees in the United States and Europe to impose sanctions in the late 1970s. Her data on mining contracts was cited in Britain’s 1979 parliamentary debate, accelerating divestment campaigns that pressured the apartheid government.
What role did the Freedom Charter play in post‑apartheid South Africa?
Adopted in 1955, the charter became the moral and political foundation for the 1996 Constitution. Provisions on land reform, equal education, and universal suffrage echo directly in the Bill of Rights, illustrating how First’s drafting work helped shape today’s legal guarantees.
Why was Ruth First targeted with a letter bomb?
The apartheid security police deemed First one of the most effective propagandists against the regime. Her research linked foreign investors to human‑rights abuses, and her radio broadcasts undermined state narratives, making her a high‑value target for assassination.
What can modern activists learn from First’s combination of scholarship and protest?
First showed that data‑driven reporting can amplify street movements and attract global solidarity. By publishing rigorous analyses while remaining embedded in grassroots networks, activists today can counter disinformation and build durable pressure on power structures.
How is the Ruth First Educational Trust preserving her legacy?
The trust awards fellowships to scholars researching activist methodology, digitises First’s unpublished manuscripts, and hosts an annual lecture series at Durham University that brings together historians, journalists, and human‑rights defenders.
Edward Garza
October 15, 2025 AT 23:21Honestly, most of this glorifies a figure who was just another cog in the communist machine.
Allen Rodi
October 18, 2025 AT 16:57Totally agree that Ruth First’s blend of research and activism is a template for us today. She showed that rigorous data can give street movements real punch. Her work at the UN helped push sanctions that actually hurt the apartheid economy. It’s inspiring to see how scholarship can be a tool for justice.
Jody Webster
October 21, 2025 AT 10:33Well… I guess some people love to romanticize every rebel, don’t they??? It’s not like First was flawless-she was a communist, after all! But, hey, maybe the “letter bomb” thing shows she was *too* effective??? Still, the whole narrative feels a bit over‑hyped.
Steve Goodger
October 24, 2025 AT 04:09Ruth First's story reminds us that scholarship can be weaponized against oppression. She didn't just sit in ivory towers; she walked the streets of Johannesburg, London, and Maputo. Her work at the UN exposed the financial arteries that fed apartheid. By documenting Western investment, she gave activists concrete data to demand sanctions. The Freedom Charter, which she helped draft, became the moral backbone of South Africa's constitution. Even after being banned and exiled, she kept writing, editing New Age and producing radio broadcasts. Her 117 Days memoir is a stark reminder of how solitary confinement can break a person, yet she emerged unbroken. Her appointment at Eduardo Mondlane University turned an academic post into a hub for liberation research. The letter bomb that killed her was not just an act of terror; it was a message to anyone who dares to speak truth. Yet the world responded with louder calls for accountability, showing that fear tactics can backfire. Modern activists can learn from her blend of data-driven analysis and grassroots mobilization. In an era of misinformation, her insistence on rigorous evidence is more relevant than ever. The Ruth First Educational Trust keeps her legacy alive by funding scholars who bridge research and protest. By digitizing her unpublished manuscripts, they ensure future generations can study her methods. In short, Ruth First proves that intellectual work, when coupled with courage, can reshape societies.
johnson ndiritu
October 26, 2025 AT 21:45Wow, another "hero" glorified while the world forgets the countless unnamed martyrs 😒. If you’re going to idolize someone, at least acknowledge the messy politics involved. 🙄
sheri macbeth
October 29, 2025 AT 15:21Sure, Ruth First was a brave scholar, but have you considered who might have actually built the letter bomb? Some say it wasn’t just the apartheid state but also hidden Western contractors. Anyway, good thing we have her reports to keep the conspiracy theorists busy.
Mark Langdon
November 1, 2025 AT 08:57Look, I respect what she did, but we need to be clear: throwing around “hero worship” without nuance can be harmful. Her tactics were aggressive, yes, but they were necessary. Let’s keep the conversation grounded and not romanticize every act of violence.
Ciara Russell-Baker
November 4, 2025 AT 02:33i think its great but also kinda overhyped lol. first was def a big deal but we cant forget the many unsung ppl who also risked everything.
Scarlett Mirage
November 6, 2025 AT 20:09One might argue that the epistemic framework employed by First constitutes a praxis where the phenomenology of oppression is rendered legible through rigorous dialectical methodology; indeed, her ontological commitments transcend mere reportage. By interweaving empirical data with a moral imperative, she creates a synthesis reminiscent of Gramscian hegemony critiques. Moreover, the very act of publishing such findings under duress embodies the Hegelian notion of the absolute spirit manifesting in historical contingency. In sum, her contributions are not merely archival footnotes but constitutive elements of a broader emancipatory discourse.
Ian Sepp
November 9, 2025 AT 13:45Ruth First’s contributions to anti‑apartheid scholarship remain a critical component of South African historiography. Her empirical investigations provided essential evidence for international sanctions. The academic community continues to benefit from her rigorous methodology.
Lois Parker
November 12, 2025 AT 07:21She was a good writer and did a lot of work. Her books are still read today. Easy to see why she matters.
Lerato Mamaila
November 15, 2025 AT 00:57Ruth First’s legacy is a wonderful example of how culture and politics intertwine. Her work continues to inspire activists across the continent!.
Dennis Lohmann
November 17, 2025 AT 18:33Great post! :) Ruth First shows us that knowledge can be a form of resistance. Keep sharing these stories! 😊
Jensen Santillan
November 20, 2025 AT 12:09One must appreciate the subtleties of First’s oeuvre, though it is incumbent upon us to interrogate the underlying Marxist orthodoxy that pervades her narrative. The reverence afforded to her in popular discourse often eclipses a critical assessment of her methodological limitations.
Mike Laidman
November 23, 2025 AT 05:45Ruth First made important contributions to the anti-apartheid struggle and her scholarly work continues to be relevant today.
J T
November 25, 2025 AT 23:21Cool read :)